Dirt Rally 2.0: Which is Better? References ^ YouTube: WRC 9 VS Dirt Rally 2.0 (Graphics & Sound) You May Also Like Car Games Top 5 Fastest Cars in DiRT Rally 2.0 Car Games DiRT Rally vs. You can have fun by experiencing both of these events. The above-specified is a short yet detailed comparison between WRC 9 and DiRT Rally 2.0. However, the force feedback system is relatively weak than that of WRC 9, but it is decent and all the other aspects outweigh this. The overall winner is DiRT Rally 2.0 because of the great physics, more variety of cars, enhanced sound, and dynamic visual effects. Furthermore, the sound of the engine starting is horrendous in WRC 9. WRC 9 also has fairly decent sounds, but they are not clear and accurate as compared to DiRT 2.0. You can also hear the voice of your co-driver more explicitly.
DiRT 2.0 also includes enhanced weather and rocks sounds. The built-in sound system of DiRT Rally 2.0 is more dynamic than that of WRC 9. You can hear the tire screeches, throttle sounds, and crashing voices in a more detailed way, which is accurate as well. The sound quality is better in DiRT Rally 2.0. However, WRC 9 also has some pretty decent graphics, but it is not up to the mark of DiRT Rally 2.0. The lively weather conditions, superior shadow quality, and the details of the track are something of the next level.
AestheticsĭiRT Rally 2.0 has far superior textures and graphics as compared to WRC 9. Hence, in terms of car selection, DiRT Rally 2.0 has the upper hand compared to WRC 9. In short, DiRT Rally 2.0 includes both modern and old rally cars, so there is a variety of options for you to choose from. If this brighter aesthetic stays remains to be seen, but it certainly is different when compared to its predecessor. There are vintage rally cars in DiRT Rally 2.0, which is a super cool feature of the game. This is noticeably different from Dirt 4's look which had more of a simple look to match its more realistic take on racing, something that game had in common with Dirt's spinoff series, Dirt Rally. DiRT Rally 2.0 has a limited number of race stages, but the variety of rally classes is more. The racing stages are more entertaining as well as compared to DiRT Rally 2.0. The number of events and stages is more in WRC 9 as compared to DiRT Rally 2.0. Hence, the physics in uneven terrains is relatively accurate than DiRT Rally 2.0. Handling the car in WRC 9 is also strenuous when driving in rough terrain. However, WRC 9 also has a strong force feedback system with a solid physics engine that makes it more immersive, particularly when driving off-road conditions. The contact physics are also strong, and therefore, you can feel even the tiniest cracks on the road.
The built-in physics engine of DiRT Rally 2.0 is strong and offers great force feedback. If we talk about physics, DiRT Rally 2.0 has some of the most advanced and accurate physics amongst some of the most popular racing games. There are some primary differences between WRC 9 and DiRT Rally 2.0. However, there are some differences between these two which we will discuss today. The physics of both these games are accurate, and the graphics are splendid. In this article, we will compare WRC 9 and Dirt Rally 2.0 and pick up a clear winner to help you choose one game.īoth the games are good to play and are arcade-focused. Many gamers before buying one of these games search on the internet to see the side-by-side comparison of both these games. And when we talk about these games, we cannot miss WRC 9 and DiRT Rally 2.0. When I heard they couldn't be bothered to model the cockpits, I made sure to avoid it, and when I heard it was because they were relying on marketing data, instead of leaving design to the passion and creativity of their devs, I just facepalmed.Rallying and racing games are one of the most played games in the world. Sorry for going off-topic, but I never played Grid 2. Simulators are supposed to contain as many accurate systems as possible, that's what a sim is. It's the difference between having actual AI opponents in a game, and AI opponents that magically disappear when they're out of view, like they do in their F1 games. One is an attempt to model a system accurately, the other is just meant to trick you. Anything you see in a Codemasters game isn't simulated, it's hacked together and there's a huge difference. It's all held together with twine and scotch tape. As a racing game that requires a bit of skill, it's extremely fun and rewarding.Ĭodemasters have really never been on a level where they've been able to create accurate systems.Īnyone ever play Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising? I remember playing around with the editor and realizing just how ridiculously limited the EGO Engine was. I really don't understand the sim label for Dirt Rally.
0 kommentar(er)
